Disclaimer: All content on this site is provided in good faith and for informational purposes only. Unless explicitly stated and sourced, all information should be considered alleged and unverified. We quote third parties and include archival material for informational and educational purposes, and do not endorse defamatory or harmful statements. For full details, visit our Disclaimer page.

Hot take:

2025-05-29 274 words 2 mins read

Hot take:

Many of you are WAYYY too concerned about whether or not Epstein killed himself.

However he died, it does not change that Epstein was operating an international child trafficking honeypot/blackmail intelligence operation, that compromised our politicians.

Yeah it would certainly be a bad thing if the Deep State were able to get in and kill Epstein so he couldn’t talk more, and I know that’s been a popular theory for years, one that I’ve considered as well, but we have exactly ZERO proof of that. The only thing we have, is that the situation is extremely suspicious. We have no proof that anyone killed him. We only have speculation.

Far too many people have arrived at a conclusion, without any evidence. I agree the situation is sketchy, and many intelligence agencies wanted Epstein dead, but nothing is concrete. We’ve seen no confirmation.

But my main point is, regardless of how he died, the overall objective does not change. Going after the clients and the intelligence agencies behind this plot, like CIA, Mossad, MI6, probably more, those are the people we want. We want to know who has been compromised, and who is doing the compromising. Epstein was just a front man for a larger operation. A minor cog in the machine.

So I’m not sure why there is such a big fuss about Patel and Bongino saying that based on the evidence we have now, it appears Epstein killed himself. If we get evidence to the contrary, we can adjust our position, but as of now, none exists, and ultimately, how Epstein died is irrelevant to hunting down his clients/handlers.

Source:

https://t.me/@bioclandestine/5068

This article includes information sourced from third parties. Where sources are unavailable, such as broken or missing links, we were unable to directly verify the claims. Readers are encouraged to evaluate the information critically and seek additional verification where necessary.

author

Authored By TMB LLC

Our Mission is to bridge the gap between mainstream and independent news while offering transparent, honest, and reliable information.

This website uses cookies to ensure you get the best experience on our website. Learn more Got it