Disclaimer: All content on this site is provided in good faith and for informational purposes only. Unless explicitly stated and sourced, all information should be considered alleged and unverified. We quote third parties and include archival material for informational and educational purposes, and do not endorse defamatory or harmful statements. For full details, visit our Disclaimer page.
REPORT: President Trump Opposed Israeli Strikes on Iran Nuclear Sites
2025-04-17
377 words
2 mins read
REPORT: President Trump Opposed Israeli Strikes on Iran Nuclear Sites
The report comes as a result of leaks to the New York Times. Which, given the nature of the subject matter and administration officials involved, indicates the sourcing is from the domestic IC side of things. Specifically, the greatest likelihood is from someone in the Office of the Director of National Intelligence (DNI) talking to media. Keep that in mind.
According to leaked information to the New York Times, President Trump did not agree with an Israeli proposal to launch military strikes against Iran. According to the narrative as advanced, President Trump, Director of National Intelligence Tulsi Gabbard and Defense Secretary Pete Hegseth were in agreement to attempt diplomatic solutions instead of bombing Iran.
Israel could not conduct the attack without U.S. support, which President Trump decided not to give. Instead, Trump wanted a more forceful push toward engagement and diplomacy with Iran surrounding the ongoing contentious issue of nuclear development
This is where we need to insert the element that all media generally refuse to associate, Russia.
Iran has reengaged with officials from President Trump’s administration following a letter Trump wrote to the leadership in Iran. President Trump wants Mideast peace; he also wants to avoid the issue of Iran having a nuclear weapon. President Trump views military action as the last possible resort for failed diplomatic and geopolitical efforts.
Israel wants to attack Iran. President Trump wants to support Israel but doesn’t want expanded military conflict that pulls the USA into more Mideast war.
As we see in the continued issues within Ukraine, the CIA supports expanded conflict in both Ukraine and Iran. Israel and the CIA are in alignment. Hence, in our ongoing restaurant analogy, the CIA is the kitchen, and Israel has a table there.
Russian President Vladimir Putin could be an influential geopolitical partner with President Trump, if Trump can get the issues of Ukraine and Russia solved and then pivot to Iran.
Unfortunately, the CIA does not want the issues within Ukraine solved, doesn’t want Trump and Putin coordinating and certainly doesn’t want Trump and Putin to work out a new strategic global map that does not contain useful conflict. Again, Israel and the CIA are in alignment.
Source:
This article includes information sourced from third parties. Where sources are unavailable, such as broken or missing links, we were unable to directly verify the claims. Readers are encouraged to evaluate the information critically and seek additional verification where necessary.
Authored By TMB LLC
Our Mission is to bridge the gap between mainstream and independent news while offering transparent, honest, and reliable information.