Disclaimer: All content on this site is provided in good faith and for informational purposes only. Unless explicitly stated and sourced, all information should be considered alleged and unverified. We quote third parties and include archival material for informational and educational purposes, and do not endorse defamatory or harmful statements. For full details, visit our Disclaimer page.
😲 Last month, **France nearly banned encryption**. A law requiring messaging apps to implement a bac
2025-04-21
351 words
2 mins read
😲 Last month, France nearly banned encryption. A law requiring messaging apps to implement a backdoor for police access to private messages was passed by the Senate. Luckily, it was shot down by the National Assembly. Yet 3 days ago the Paris Police Prefect advocated for it again. 🤦♂️
The members of the National Assembly were wise to reject a law that would have made France the first country in the world to strip its citizens of their right to privacy. Even countries that many Europeans view as lacking in freedoms have never banned encryption. Why?
Because it’s technically impossible to guarantee that only the police can access a backdoor. Once introduced, a backdoor can be exploited by other parties — from foreign agents to hackers. As a result, the private messages of all law abiding citizens can get compromised.
Aimed at preventing drug trafficking, the law wouldn’t have helped fight crime anyway. Even if mainstream encrypted apps had been weakened by a backdoor, criminals could still communicate securely through dozens of smaller apps — and become even harder to trace due to VPNs.
This is why, as I’ve said before, Telegram would rather exit a market than undermine encryption with backdoors and violate basic human rights. Unlike some of our competitors, we don’t trade privacy for market share.
In it’s 12-year history, Telegram has never disclosed a single byte of private messages. In accordance with the EU Digital Services Act, if provided with a valid court order, Telegram would only disclose the IP addresses and phone numbers of criminal suspects — not messages.
Last month, freedom prevailed. But it was a reminder: we must keep explaining to lawmakers that encryption isn’t built to protect criminals — it protects the privacy and safety of ordinary people. Losing that protection would be tragic.
The battle is far from over. This month, the European Commission proposed a similar initiative to add backdoors to messaging apps. No country is immune to the slow erosion of freedoms. Every day, those freedoms come under attack — and every day, we must defend them. 🛡
Source:
This article includes information sourced from third parties. Where sources are unavailable, such as broken or missing links, we were unable to directly verify the claims. Readers are encouraged to evaluate the information critically and seek additional verification where necessary.
Authored By TMB LLC
Our Mission is to bridge the gap between mainstream and independent news while offering transparent, honest, and reliable information.